!
clause it was a fim not exceeding 18.5.
&
in the repealed they clause it was a
? Before sanctiming and apk
this provatnih propiled, porating
A
out that is the Straits recent can it
on
маржина
Please annen
gi5 Jan 29
the report &
the Police in connexion
Kary
Ew
10 Je
Lee 10535/86
x
with fumthing at
* Cammill
7
Cove
Sa
X.
X not with
In desp. of 17 any. 1887 a
همسه
that paper, we expressed general Concurrence in pars. 4,687 of the Report) which
auray
other things recommended on
(1) increasing penalty in keepers of
hauser 1 (2) making
Sacubling
2
the owner
to a very sliffet extrat
the house responsible, This Ord. does (1) (but not (2); and besides relieves the players "
not among
which was of the Report
the recommendatio
guy11 Jan
The former night to have fin some Explanation of this my important alteration of the law in a matter wheel has hen the
Filipetof &o much prerius discapin and Emerfinder
I are inclined to thinch that the Ard." 41576 four ton for in making it a penal office to "use Launt or be found
прив
in
A
have com bowl.
room
plaer kopt for pathic playing or proathing
but I think that the core should be contened
a provision similar t
and I would direct Ihr the demite being de
its amendment in that sense.
326
(Mr. Schally has a story opinion against any interference with froubling and he secus Whave persuaded the froommer to some extent)
K
12/1
Ew 11 Jan
Keek Jan 11
ĮPage 331
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.